Good point - I had forgotten about that, and I still do like that proposal! :)
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Arunkumar Srinivasan <[email protected] > wrote: > Eddi, > Gabor's suggestions here: > http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/datatable-help/2013-May/001738.html > are > quite nice! We did agree with those changes at the time :). I'll have to > write to Matthew to get his feedback. > > Arun > > On Saturday, November 9, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Eduard Antonyan wrote: > > Great, this is smth I was thinking about recently as well. > > I do find nomatch=TRUE/FALSE confusing and keep.nomatch is better in that > respect, but that's a lot more characters to type, which downgrades it for > me a lot. > > I think in a world where I was designing it from scratch I would have > nomatch=NA do what it does now, nomatch=NULL do what 0 does now, and then > the rest of the values would fill. Not sure if this can be done smoothly > though in the world we live in. > > >
_______________________________________________ datatable-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
