Frank, for consistency, I think it should.
--
Arun
On 5 May 2015 at 22:49:41, Frank Erickson ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi,
In answering this question
http://stackoverflow.com/q/30062012/1191259
...I noticed that
* df[,0] gives an empty data.frame, but
* dt[,0,with=FALSE] does not give an empty data.table.
Should it? I switched to using `[.listof`(dt,0), which gives my expected result.
Best,
Frank
_______________________________________________
datatable-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
_______________________________________________
datatable-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
