On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:18 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <[email protected]> wrote: > and their direct influence on the UTC-TAI difference: > > http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/index.php?index=leapsecond&lang=en
Cool plot, but "due to the initial choice of the value of the second (1/86400 mean solar day of the year 1820)" sounds like nonsense. How did they measure the "mean solar day of the year 1820" in caesium-133 radiation periods without sending someone back in time with an atomic clock? I thought only Guido had a time machine! _______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
