On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Alexander Belopolsky < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> > wrote: > > How did we end up bending over this far backwards for leap seconds? > > That's why I think February 29, 1900 may be a better selling point for > PEP-0500 than the 36 (and counting) leap seconds. > I'm surely missing a joke here. Is this just the problem with the POSIX standard disagreeing with Pope Gregory XIII? -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
