> On Aug 25, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Akira Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > note: stdlib variant datetime.now(timezone.utc).astimezone() may fail if it > uses time.timezone, time.tzname internally [3,4,5] when tm_gmtoff > tm_zone are not available on a given platform. If this actually happens on any supported platform - please file a bug report. What we do in this case is not as simplistic as you describe. _______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Carl Meyer
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
- Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
