On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Alexander Belopolsky < [email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If you want that, use tics or numpy.datetime64. >> > > Chris, please stop promoting numpy.datetime64 here. It is definitely not > a positive example of how a date/time manipulation library should be > designed. > Sorry -- didn't mean to promote -- and yes, it's actually really horrible, particularly for anything to do with time zones. The point was that there are other ways to get performance for datetime arithmetic if that's what you need. That's all. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
