On 4 September 2015 at 23:39, Tim Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems 495 really doesn't do anything for pytz, so I'm not sure > Stuart would bother to implement 495-conforming tzinfos. _Someone_ > will, though. Eventually ;-) I'll do it, but more than happy for someone else to do it first. 3.6 I guess. More support in stdlib means fewer confused pytz users. I still worry that landing real timezones in stdlib will be dropping the pants on datetime, exposing its warts for all to see. -- Stuart Bishop <[email protected]> http://www.stuartbishop.net/ _______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
