+1, just submit a patch and mark it for 3.6. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Berker Peksağ <[email protected]> wrote:
> The idea was came up when I reviewed issue 22241 [1] and Alexander > said "This is a reasonable request": > > http://bugs.python.org/review/22241/ > > Currently, we have tests like (see Lib/test/datetimetester.py) > > self.assertEqual('UTC', timezone.utc.tzname(None)) > self.assertEqual('UTC', timezone(ZERO).tzname(None)) > self.assertEqual('UTC-05:00', timezone(-5 * HOUR).tzname(None)) > self.assertEqual('UTC+09:30', timezone(9.5 * HOUR).tzname(None)) > > Can we just make dt optional and set its default value to None in Python > 3.6? So > > timezone.utc.tzname(None) and timezone.utc.tzname() > > will both return "UTC". It's a small change, but I think it will make > the API cleaner. > > --Berker > > [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue22241 > _______________________________________________ > Datetime-SIG mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig > The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
