On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Random832 <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to assume that the interpretations that led to your results > are: > a = 2002-04-07 01:40:00 -0500 = 2002-04-07 06:40:00 Z > b = 2002-04-07 02:20:00 -0400 = 2002-04-07 06:20:00 Z > Looks right: >>> print(a) 2002-04-07 01:40:00-05:00 >>> print(a.astimezone(UTC)) 2002-04-07 06:40:00+00:00 >>> print(b) 2002-04-07 02:20:00-04:00 >>> print(b.astimezone(UTC)) 2002-04-07 06:20:00+00:00 > I don't think this is a reasonable value for b.astimezone(UTC) to have. > You would have to go back in time to 2002-2003 and argue with Tim and Guido about that. Trust me - you would loose. Arguing about it today is even more futile.
_______________________________________________ Datetime-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
