Abigail wrote: > I strongly disagree that Time::Piece is simple and powerful enough > [for reasons that appear to have to do with the implementation.]
The truth is I only looked at the manual. It is the interface I find nice, I have no opinion on the implementation. It is the interface that I find simple, powerful and extensible. If the implementation isn't good enough, you can always change it and leave the interface as it is. But I did not make my point clear enough: my point is not so much that Time::Piece should be standardized, but, rather, that the effort should be concentrated on standardizing a module. (And, of course, one can naturally expect lots of disagreement on technical details during this effort.)
