Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Peter J. Acklam wrote: > > > [I know this is a very old posting, but I just can't resist > > commenting it since it is about the base time format.] > > It seems a little irrelevant, and perhaps even unfair, to start > rebutting comments that I made going on 2 years ago. A lot has > happened since then, and we've made a lot of progress since > then. The note that you're commenting on represents the > *beginning* of the discussion, and addresses points that have > been rehashed numerous times. Returning to the beginning does > not serve our purposes a whole lot.
I searched the archives and read a whole lot of postings, but didn't find anything about what I wrote, so that's why I posted it. I wanted to join this project and contribute something, but first I wanted to understand the reason behind some of the design decisions made, hence my postings and questions. But never mind, I'll shut up. Peter -- #!/local/bin/perl5 -wp -*- mode: cperl; coding: iso-8859-1; -*- # matlab comment stripper (strips comments from Matlab m-files) s/^((?:(?:[])}\w.]'+|[^'%])+|'[^'\n]*(?:''[^'\n]*)*')*).*/$1/x;
