I still think it is a MakeMaker problem, has anyone reported it to
them?
I plan on adding it to the FAQ until we get it resolved properly.
-ben
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:24:24AM -0700, Hill, Ronald wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> > Rather than document it, is there any way to fix the Makefile
> > to have 32 1k lines instead of 1 32k line?
>
> I guess I was not clean as what I was refering to when I
> made the statement of "Document it". What I should have
> asked is "Is there a place to document the test results
> that I have" Sorry, I should have been more clear.
>
> However, I agree the this needs to be fixed in the
> makefile.
>
> > Having to require a specific make/gmake is really
> > not a good plan. It should be very unusual to require some
> > different helper utility like 'gmake' to build an
> > extension to Perl when that resident 'make' can
> > build Perl itself.
> >
> > John
> >
> You are absolutely correct!!
>
>
> Ron Hill
