On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:01:21PM +1000, Iain Truskett wrote:
>
> That version isn't on CPAN yet. To be honest, I'd really
> like the validation to be optional. While some people have
> more use for validation rather than normalization, others
> (like me) are the opposite =)
I half agree. Initially I thought that it should be optional and said
so on the list. Dave replied saying that he wouldn't make it so
unless anyone had an example of why it needed to be optional.
So far I haven't come up with a reasonable one. If you have a real
case mail it to the list.
-ben
