Flavio wrote: > The DT::Set::ICal class is inlined into DT::E::Recurrence. > Maybe it should be published separately?
Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > I think so - not everyone that uses DT::E::Recurrence will want it. But if I added support for ICal formatting, then DT::E::Recurrence would _always_ require DT::Set::ICal! Now I'm thinking of keeping DT:E:Recurrence as-is, and only support DT:E:ICal recurrences formatting. People who need ICal output would use DT:E:ICal instead of DT:E:Recurrence. The DT::Set::ICal class would be inlined into DT::E::ICal, as Dave said. - Flavio S. Glock
