> > Great, but the $64K question is: do we then get parse() and parser() methods > > in DateTime, which default to use DT::F::Simple? :) > > Maybe. It would introduce another dependency for DateTime.pm, but OTOH > it's a dependency that most folks would probably end up downloading > anyway.
I'm not really excited about this proposed feature. If it is included the loading of DT::F::Simple should be deferred until parse_datetime is called. -J --
