On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Flavio S. Glock wrote: > > > There are some cases when we don't know if a recurrence has any event at > > > all. > > > This may happen when you do an intersection of recurrences. > > > Otherwise, if they don't have a start and end, they are infinite, right? > > > But 'undef' is ok - I'll change that. > > > > Well, the set may not have a start or end, but it's quite possible that > > the callback may simply not return anything before or after certain > > datetimes. > > I think this would give an error, in current implementation. > If a recurrence ends, it must have an explicit 'end' date.
If we want to document and specify that this is an error, then the size should be infinite. Otherwise, if we might want to allow this in the future, undef is correct. I don't feel too terribly strongly either way. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
