On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 10:22, Dave Rolsky wrote: > DateTimeX has been proposed before. I for one like it, as a way for > people to release stuff that does what they want, but doesn't aim at > fitting in with the rest of the DateTime modules. I believe other people > had objections.
I don't remember talking about it, but it seems a good idea to me .. however I'd prefer DateTime::X::Pregnancy or DateTime::Misc::Pregnancy ... I just think that DateTimeX looks too strange. It works for modules whose namespace is all upper (like CGI, DBI, LWP etc), but looks a little strange for namespaces like DateTime. That, however, is just my $0.02. We do need some namespace for modules that don't fit elsewhere. Cheers! Rick
