If there's nobody else, I don't mind being the maintainer, except I doubt that I'll be doing much more than "maintenance" (as opposed to active development). I should be able to respond in time in cases like these, though.

Claus, the module is pretty much stable nowadays, right?

--d


Claus Färber wrote:
Hallo,

John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb/wrote:

On 3/15/05 11:54 PM, Cees Hek wrote:

I sent a bug report and patch to this list back in January [1]
regarding DateTime::Format::Pg, and I never received a response.  Just
wondering if this slipped through the cracks.  In the meantime, I have
logged this as a bug in rt.cpan.org [2].


I think the DateTime::Format::Pg is officially MIA.  I filed a bug 4
months ago and have tried to contact the author many times.


Sorry about that. I'm afraid all of the messages went into the spam
folder where they did not stand out enough for me to notice them
(unfortunatly, both the spam filter and my brain seem to be biased
against messages written in English as I rarely get English
non-spam messages).
I stopped reading the mailing list regularily due to lack of time.


Does someone want to take over DateTime::Format::Pg?


As I've already said, I don't have too much time at the moment. If
there's someone else willing to maintain the module, this might be
better.

In the meantime, I'll upload a new version of DT::F::Pg.

Claus




Reply via email to