It's not "rolled in", but the D::F::Builder just has W3CDTF.pm in examples/ directory to show how you can reimplement W3CDTF using Builder framework, at least it looks like.
On 3/5/06, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, kellan wrote: > > > > > On 3/4/06, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1997-07-16T19:20:30.45+01:00 is a valid W3CDTF format but D::F::W3CDTF > >> thinks it's invalid. Here's a quick'n nasty patch. > > > > On a related note the existence of two D::F::W3CDTF's on CPAN causes a > > certain amount of confusion. There is my original module, which has > > subsquently been rolled into D::F::Builder. > > I only see one when I search for it on search.cpan.org or via the cpanplus > shell. Why would it be rolled in anyway? That wouldn't make much sense. > > > -dave > > /*=================================================== > VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com > Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog > ===================================================*/ > -- Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
