Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Jozef Kutej wrote: > >>> I noticed you released a module DateTime::WorkingHours recently. I'd >>> prefer that folks not release modules under the DateTime namespace >>> without talking to the datetime@perl.org list about it first. In >>> particular, the namespace you've chosen doesn't really fit within the >>> DateTime namespace guidelines (see >>> http://datetime.perl.org/index.cgi?NamespaceStandards) >> >> Sorry, I didn't know. I got fast "inspiration" from >> DateTime::BusinessHours. But as I look now it doesn't have a log >> "history". > > Heh, I contacted the author of that module too but he never replied. > >>> Would you mind posting something to the datetime@perl.org list to >>> discuss both the name and API of your module? Alternately, if you don't >>> want to do that, I'd appreciate it if you'd rename the module so it >>> doesn't start with "DateTime::". >> >> I don't mind to think of any different name (inside or outside of >> DateTime::). What are the suggestions? > > Well, if you want it in the DateTime:: namespace, we should discuss the > API first on the list. The key is to make sure that the API looks like > any similar modules. > > In this particular case, I'm not sure there _are_ any similar modules, > which is all the more reason to get the API right this time, so that any > similar modules that come along later have a model to follow. >
I have renamed the module to Time::WorkHours. Regards, Jozef
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
