Dave Rolsky wrote: >It's not like maintaining DT::TZ and updating it when there are new >Olson releases is a big hassle, so I don't mind doing it for a while.
Yes, that's another issue I was planning to raise. Continued DT:TZ 1.xx releases would give distros the choice of a lengthy period in which to switch. There are enough 1.xx version numbers left for another couple of years. >I'll suggest September 1 as the cutover date when Zefram will release >DateTime::TimeZone 2.00 using the new code base. Works for me. There's one remaining unresolved item, the zic bugs, but if that's not resolved on the Olson end by September then I'll put some workaround into DT:TZ:Tzfile. -zefram
