On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, S�nke Ruempler wrote:

> > MaxMTAOps += 1;
>
> ehm yes, but thats only for that specific case. if the mail i quoted had one
> more hop and i hat MaxMTAOps+=1, the problem would be there again. so as i
> wrote, it's stupid that xmail declares a mail, that had more mta hops than
> MaxMTAOps var, but that is in the end at the right place (local mailbox), as
> failed.
>
> i hope you understand me :-)

MaxMTAOps must be set to a protection value for mail loops. If you mail
has more than 20 hops, you have a problem. And no, i'm not willing to move
the loop check deep down in the chain to check if the mail is local.




- Davide



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to