On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, John Kielkopf wrote: > ---- Original Message ----- > From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "XMail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:53 PM > Subject: [xmail] Re: Quick mailproc.tab question. > > > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, John Kielkopf wrote: > > > > > Good to know. > > > > > > May want to make a note of it in the Doc, just to avoid confusion. > > > > > > I assume when rebuilding the mailproc.tab after parsing, multiple > "mailbox" > > > lines could be eliminated without any change in behavior? and the same > > > would hold true for combining multiple redirect lines to a single one? > > > > It depends. A double mailbox is very likely to be merged because you > > probably do not want to have double messages > > I see. This is what I'm doing currently, so I'll probably leave it. If > there's multiple "mailbox" commands, more than likely it's in error. Can > anyone think of any good reason why someone would want to receive multiples > of the same message? > > > but a double redirect could > > be a _requested_ behavior. > > > > But; > "redirect"[tab]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[tab]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[newline] > would accomplish the same thing as: > "redirect"[tab]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[newline] > "redirect"[tab]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[newline] > > correct? So my parse routine could combine all redirect addresses to a > single line and still have the same effect?
In theory, at least if someone does not want to send two messages to the same address. > > This is something I need to fix. Currently, a second redirect command will > step on the first, so in the end, only the last redirect command line will > be used. > > On that note, what's xmail's line length limit? Just keep it under 512 bytes and you're safe ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
