On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, DOLIST Technical Center wrote:
> Return-Path: > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: from mail.dolist.net (mail.dolist.net [195.101.185.146]) > by groundzero.ordb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD65B5B104 > for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:27:01 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from mail.dolist.net (212.234.39.225) > by circle.dolist.lan with [XMail 1.8 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server] > id for from <@dolist.net:spamtest@[212.234.39.225]>; > Thu, 06 Jun 2002 12:27:03 +0200 > Received: from localhost.localdomain (62.79.38.254) > by cube.dolist.net with [XMail 1.8 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server] > id for <@dolist.net:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ; > Thu, 06 Jun 2002 12:27:02 +0200 did you change XMail ? empty "id", "for" and "from" would never happen. "from <>" is fine but "id" and "for" are always filled. beside that, they're using a subtle trick, explicit routing : for <@dolist.net:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> this require a bit of "thought" because the machine is using itself ( MXs ) to send the message and a smtprelay test is probably going to succeed. let me think about it ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
