On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > hello davide and list, > > we use extaliases.tab for adress-mapping. the problem is, that xmail chan= ges > the return-path, because we use digital signatures. > so these signatures are getting falsified by xmail, at least the client i= n > the internal net who gets the mail is "thinking" that. > > my idea is, that xmail could add an "reply-to"-header with the internal > adress and leave the return-path/from headers as they are. then the mua > should not complain about a falsified signatur, ah? > > davide, whats you opinion about that?
it sounds good, let me look at it ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
