On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Newsmirror wrote: > > Pls benchmark before talking. A thin client written in C is so fast that > > its execution time literally vanish compared to the execution time of your > > filter. I had something like this that I was using to load an SMTP server > > for benchmark testing and it was capable of 600000 runs per hour on a > > PIII 900MHz. > > > > I've benchmarked the Scope client to the point of 10000 rounds, and I can > tell from this that HDD and CPU makes impact on performance. Without > anything to compare the benchmark with, it doesn't tell anything though > whether this or that approach is better.
Look, a thin clien written in C will be about 30Kb in size and after one run it'll fit the buffer cache of any sane OS ( yes, even windows ). The CPU and HD I/O you're looking at _is_ the activity that the server does do. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
