On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Michal Bursa wrote: > > > Thare are better technics to get rid of spam. Maps and spamassassin ( o= > r > > any other of the 24598 anti-spam tools ) are just two of them. > > Hi. > > Yes I know these tools. Mapping is fine, but it not works with forwarded=20 > mails. Spam-assassin is also very sofisticated tool, but if you use it, y= > ou=20 > are in fact accepting all spam (and after whole mail is received, then it= > is=20 > deleted). > Because I have rather limited connection bandwidth I see using of=20 > spam-address and spammers files as very efficient way how to block spam=20 > without a lost of bandwidth. > > I know that implementing reg-ex is very very difficult, but there exists = > some=20 > GNU libraries which might be used. Anyway, I've looked a bit into your so= > urce=20 > files and found that in spam-address pattern it is possible to use more=20 > options than only "*" - also "?" and "[..]" is recognized. This should be= > =20 > mentioned in the documentation.
Hey, if everything is documented, where's the fun ? :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
