On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, DOLIST Technical Center wrote: > > Bonjour Davide, > > Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 7:30:40 PM, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > This is a free world man, you can try whatever you like. My suggestion is > > to try another *OS*, because an OS's file system that slows down > > performance with an average of only 1600 files inside a folder is, by > > definition, *crap*. > > Last time I checked, XMail was 10 ( ten ) times faster on Linux respect to > > Windows on the same HW. Not 2, not even 4, but 10. > > Well this is not the problem at all, I would have know that you will > reply this :o) I'm happy to use Xmail, "the final solution" would have > been bad when we support and talk about your product to many customers > or relation :/ > > Anyway is there a way to not use this cache ? Even if *nix would have > run x10 faster and I would have x10 more domains in cache, how is the > gain between disk access and tcp/ip DNS request ? How does this cache > works ? Does Xmail when It needs a MX requets scan all folders to find > for each mail if the domain already exists in one of them of the > information is stored permanently in memory ? Or just have I to > setup a cron to delete periodically the domains in the 100 folders, > for example ?
1.14 will have "-MD ndirs" to set the split level of the cache. Yes, the cache is very effective for speed and network bandwidth savings. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
