Thanks Thom. It's definitely understandable for something like this to slip through the cracks.
As you said, maybe the dvmevmupdate site should have some notes describing this requirement. Also, maybe a post to this mailing list with a clear subject like "Attention: DVEVM 1.10 upgrade requirement". Thanks, - Paul _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
