From: "Kevin Hilman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Can you submit your patches inline with an email subject
> of the form:
> [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: <brief one-line description>
>
> Then in the email a more detail description (if necessary)
> and then a
>
> Signed-off-by: Your Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Followed by the patch.
>
> Thanks a lot for you contributions.  I don't mean to make
> your life more
> difficult, but this is the linux-kernel way for public
> submission and
> review of patches.  Following this makes it easier to
> review, comment
> and then merge incoming patches.

Sure, no problem! Just one question: as a rule of thumb, is it better to
release the code as soon as it compiles and runs (and therefore it's perfect
;-)) or to delay the release until it's more stable? For example I could
already post a first version of the bitbanged SPI driver, it works enough to
allow some people to play with it but probably it still has some bugs and
needs to be tweaked. I did most of my tests in loopback (MOSI attached to
MISO), I won't be able to test the driver with a real SPI peripheral for
some days. Should I wait until then?

Cheers, Lorenzo

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to