Troy Kisky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dirk Behme wrote: >> Troy Kisky wrote: >>> davinci-i2c: fix lost interrupt >>> DAVINCI_I2C_STR_REG is a write 1 to clear register, >>> so don't use a read/modify/write cycle. >>> EVM doesn't have platform data yet, make bus_delay default correct >>> Ensure psc value gives a clock between 7-12 Mhz >>> Make sure no interrupts are pending before starting transfer >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Many thanks for this! >> >> Unfortunately I have some problems applying your patches. I had >> already trouble with applying the ethernet patch, but this was only >> one line I fixed manually. But below are some more lines, and patch >> rejects everything >> >> patching file drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 123. >> Hunk #2 FAILED at 147. >> Hunk #3 FAILED at 177. >> Hunk #4 FAILED at 282. >> Hunk #5 FAILED at 364. >> Hunk #6 FAILED at 410. >> Hunk #7 FAILED at 424. >> Hunk #8 FAILED at 451. >> 8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c >> >> Seems to me that tabs are replaced by spaces in the patch. >> >> Can you check? Or is anybody else able to apply this cleanly? >> > > GRRGRGRGRGRRGGGGGRRRRRR > > Ok. I'll send to myself first and then resend everything.
Also note that Bernard Blackham has been working on an updated MMC stack as well. I'm awaiting his patches against 2.6.24. It would be great if you two would coordinate efforts on these patches. Maybe you can help him track down the last couple failuers in Pierre Ossman's testcases. Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
