Kevin Hilman wrote: > Troy Kisky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Interrupts are enabled at the point where >> the DAVINCI_I2C_IVR_REG is read, so unless >> at interrupt happened just at that moment, >> no interrupt would be pending. Even though >> documentation implies you should do this, >> I see no reason. >> >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm not sure about this one. Are you noticing performance issues with > this? I tend to agree with you that this _seems_ unnecessary, but > I'm wondering if is there to workaround a hardware problem. > > Some feedback from any of the TI engrs would be helpful here. > > Kevin There was a patch a couple of days ago to add i2c slave functionality. Once that is in use, the IVR read would quit being merely useless and would become a full fledged, hard to replicate bug.
Troy _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
