If you use the DM355 then all of your programming will be done on the ARM. I imagine you will be limited in the amount of filtering you can accomplish on the ARM.
Brad ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Ho Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: DM355 or DM6437 Hi, I am new to the DaVinci but very interested in exploring the capability. There is an opportunity in my company for a machine vision project. However, I am very confused about many selections of the DaVinci series. I have read the online webminar as well as some materials on the DaVinci Wiki. Currently, I am stuck between DM355 and DM6437. They are both cost-effective solutions. DM355 seems to be able to provide more user interface control because of the ARM processor; while the DM6437 can implement custom filters for image manipulation. I slightly stand toward DM6437 because we have a licensed CSS 3.1. However, using the SDK provided by RidgeRun sounds very interesting too. My question is that if we pick DM355, could I still make a custom image filter or I can only use the codec provided by TI? The current goal of the project is to build up an image stabilization module. The video input is an NTSC source. The module needs to compensate for the image motion with an external gyro input (from RS232). Also, we may want to develop nonlinear filter to compensate for lens distortion in the future as well. Could anyone give me some valuable suggestions please? Thanks in advance! Best Regards, Shawn
_______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
