Hi Michael, On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Michael Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:15 +0530, Trilok Soni wrote: > > > For those who do not know, as part of the effort to build OSD > > > (www.neurostechnology.com) with Davinci 6446, Neuros cloned the 2.6.23 > > > kernel tree (git.neurostechnology.com/git/kernels) and are in the > > > process of porting existing TI video patches to it, thought it makes > > > sense to upstream the patches here. Comments are welcome, especially if > > > someone knows that the effort has been done somewhere else already, > > > > > > > This looks good, so you mean Neuros is building next OSD product with > > DM6446? If this is true, then it would be great if you can > > periodically send the generic patches to this ML for review and > > inclusion. > Indeed that is the plan. In the mean while, it is a waste of time and we > don't really want to reinvent the wheel if some of the up-porting work > has been done for version 2.6.23 or newer kernel, it would be great if > anyone knows any of the following (list may go on as we move forward) > has been done and post pointers here, > > 1. resizer, previewer, capture (Steven has done most of them, but > doesn't make sense to push if they are already done somewhere else, as > Steven's work is based on my limited understanding of udev, in fact I > brutally hacked the resizer driver without really knowing what I was > doing, although test shows it works. ;)) > > 2. USB host performance and USB Hub support (which Frank is currently > working on, it is not a trivial system as we all know.) > > 3. HD framebuffer support (720p/1080i?) > > 4. HD V4L2 support (720p/1080i?) > > 5. Davinci Open Embedded build system integration > One of the Neuros community member ported this to DM320 platform, > while we are planning to reuse his effort with Davinci, it would be > great to know if someone has already taken care of this.
We might want to add scratchbox based development environment instead. And as Dirk suggested, Neuros should better move towards using codesourcery based toolchains. I have personally setup scratchbox based environment with gtk+/x-server, lighttpd, perl, php etc. pacakges using foreign toolchain in sbox for dm644x based custom boards and it works well. -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
