Hi All, I have an algorithm which I need to run on the DSP. Once the algorithm is xDAIS compliant, I have two options to make it callable from the ARM: 1. Extend it to be xDM compliant and use one of the VISA interfaces (for example IMGENC). 2. Build extensions (stub/skeleton) to the xDAIS compliant algorithm (similar to the TI's SCALE example) .
Now the thing is that this algorithm is not really and encoder or decoder. However, it seems that I could use the VISA interface and extend the input/output arguments structures with my own parameters. I would have to live with the "IMGENC_process" function name and maybe carry around some redundant parameters. Implementation wise Option #1 seems faster/easier than #2. So, my question is: are there any really good reasons for one approach vs. the other? When would I absolutely *have to* use the stub/skeleton approach? Is one approach indeed faster/easier than the other? Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
