A copy/paste bug causes missed dma events 32-63 (i.e. underrun)
to be missed.

Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c
index 3a5da88..19ee7c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void dma_ccerr_handler(void)
        int i;
        unsigned int cnt;
        cnt = 0;
-       if ((ptr_edmacc_regs->emr == 0) && (ptr_edmacc_regs->emr == 0) &&
+       if ((ptr_edmacc_regs->emr == 0) && (ptr_edmacc_regs->emrh == 0) &&
            (ptr_edmacc_regs->qemr == 0) && (ptr_edmacc_regs->ccerr == 0))
                return;
        while (1) {
@@ -606,11 +606,12 @@ static void dma_ccerr_handler(void)
                                        /* Clear any SER */
                                        ptr_edmacc_regs->shadow[0].secrh =
                                            (1 << i);
-                                       if (intr_data[i].callback) {
-                                               intr_data[i].callback(i,
-                                                                     
DMA_CC_ERROR,
-                                                                     intr_data
-                                                                     [i].data);
+                                       if (intr_data[32 + i].callback) {
+                                               intr_data[32 + i].callback(
+                                                               32 + i,
+                                                               DMA_CC_ERROR,
+                                                               intr_data
+                                                               [32 + i].data);
                                        }
                                }
                        }
-- 
1.5.4.3


_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to