On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > I was thinking that probably rtc-firmware could have handled > the MSP430 too.
I don't see how. That would have required creating a new arch/arm/include/asm/rtc.h with a framework for other such stuff. ARM finished getting rid of its own RTC framework a few releases back; I certainly wouldn't want to try creating a new one. Plus, there's hardly any code gluing those two methods into the RTC framework. Even if this code were wedged into some version of an rtc-firmware, I'd expect the result would be bigger... The reason to have wanted rtc-ppc (which would morph into rtc-firmware) is that such an arch RTC framework was already in place: the "md" structs. An rtc-ppc would help avoid "flag days" by helping new and old frameworks coexist. Not an issue here. - Dave _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
