On Monday 05 January 2009, Troy Kisky wrote: > I'm using pause, resume in the audio RFC that I posted recently. > If you'll let them live a month longer, they'll be used.
OK, I'll reissue the patch with those two restored. > If they were in mainline before submitting the audio changes to alsa, it > would probably make them easier to accept. Of course, my use of them > is a hack to fix the AIC33 codec not performing the pause and having > the dma pause instead. But I think that particular codec problem is > common enough to keep in. Fair enough. > BTW, I really appreciate you cleaning up this code. The > davinci_request_dma API still needs work. I think this function > is trying to do too much making it overly complex. According to "nm" it's the biggest function in dma.o ... now much less so, of course! I think the *concepts* behind these programming interfaces could stand work too. Splitting master and slave requests might be good. And having one call to set up source address and indexing would be friendlier (ditto destination) if you're using the complex calls rather than just setting up and using PaRAM templates. - Dave _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
