On Friday 09 January 2009, David Brownell wrote: > The tricky part is needing to update all the code using > NAND -- UBL, U-Boot and Linux -- ideally, with a simple > update procedure that doesn't trash the old/"legacy" > badblock tables.
Ugh ... to clarify, instead of "trash" I should have written "lose the data in". Those tables themselves necessarily need to be replaced. Best if that does not involve trashing the manufacturer's badblock markers in the (normal) OOB areas. > (I don't care about the filesystem > data in the flash; that could be backed up over NFS or > on SD card, when it matters.) Then it'd be easy to > kick in UBIFS for rest of the NAND chip. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
