Hello. David Brownell wrote:
Some of the comments about my earlier EDMA patches touched on issues in that programming interface, like: - The single call to allocate DMA resources is overly complex. - Its programming model doesn't match the hardware well: talking about master vs. slave, not channels and parameter RAM; confusing those two resource types (especially when allocating); etc. - Since the calls used a "davinci_" prefix, they wouldn't be very appropriate for the DMA in the OMAP-L137 chip.
We were going to move the generic part of arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c (alomg with other common code b/w so called OMAP-L1x and DaVinci) to arch/arm/plat-davinci/ but the rename seems reasonable anyway.
- Dave
WBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
