On Monday 19 January 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > EDMA doesn't need to live in arch/... anywhere, if > > it comes to that... > > In drivers/dma/ you think?
Or drivers/misc ... a "DMA framework" wrapper around it would live in drivers/dma. Unless you want to take up the argument for lifting the restriction that drivers/dma implies DMA framework support. Me, I keep thinking that framework imposes WAY too much overhead. Though I'm glad it finally learned that the primary purpose of DMA is talking to peripherals, not as a memcpy() accelerator for certain Intel chips. - Dave _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
