On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Narnakaje, Snehaprabha wrote: > After going through some testing, it looks like the issue is > how we have the dm9000 interrupt configured on the DM355 EVM.
This doesn't explain anything to me, though ... > On DM355 EVM, we have GPIO1 configured as dm9000 interrupt line. > May be on other boards have a dedicated dm9000 interrupt line. > If we have a dedicated interrupt (to which the disable/enable > dm9000 interrupt is also tied), I think it is enough to use > global IRQ disable/enable APIs. So what's the particular problem? Something with how GPIO interrupts are being processed? I could believe that ... they've not been stressed much before, and such low-level code can hide subtle issues for a long time. But I'm still curious why I don't see the problem. Admittedly I'm not using NFS much, but still I would expect to ssee *some* dm9000 issue. - Dave _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
