Hello.
David Brownell wrote:
Sigh... it will spoil the state of another, curently active endpoint,
of course.
What do you mean by "spoil" then?
Ignore that -- I should've really gone to bed instead writing this
nonsense.
"Make it match the current hardware state" isn't exactly troublesome; it's not
consulted
except when setting up new transfers, and it's saved again
after each URB. In fact that save state isn't expected to be
valid unless there's no I/O active.
Even if there was only a short pause b/w URBs (which resulted in
tearing down qh and creating a new one then?
WBR, Seergei
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
