On Monday 09 March 2009, HONGJUN wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Thanks for your patch, I tried it, but still got problems.

Not "my" patch.  The "From:" field reports the author.


> What I need to mention is, I commented out this line when I was
> patching my kernel:
> 
> +                                     && qh->mux == 1
> 
> Because the kernel we are using is 2.6.22, which doesn't have this
> field. Would this be the key point?

I'd expect so.  Likewise, I would not be at all surprised to
learn that this patch depended on others which have merged
since the kernel you're using.

- Dave


> Also I tried to move the codes out of the "else if" clause, it did
> work for DMA mode but not for PIO, so I'm still trying.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Hongjun
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 March 2009, ququ wrote:
> >> Since you mentioned that the patch is in queue for being merged into
> >> kernel, is there anyway I can get it now? We need it badly. Thanks.
> >
> > Grab it from the queue ...
> >
> >  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-04-usb/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 




_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to