On Monday 23 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 > >> that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to > >> argue... > > > > I think the pushback was on your statement that they're > > so different as to be incompatible through the only > > programming interface (musb_hdrc) that will use this. > > So, if I understand this correctly, they are indeed quite different, > but none of those differences are actually relevant to the programming > interface actually used. > > So, that begs the original question: > > Why can't the current version simply be extended instead of creating > an entirely new driver?
Dedicated IRQ, different registers, etc. What it should do is slide into the same DMA engine abstraction that the musb driver already uses. Possibly updating that abstraction; it's not what I'd call clean, although it's there and more-or-less works. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
