Hi Chris,

I thank you a lot for this input - especially regarding the .cfg file.
Now I'm able to do a mpeg4 and a parallel jpeg too.

This input has saved me from a 3 day debug session without a clue.

Cheers,
Deepak Shankar V

-----Original Message-----
From: Ring, Chris [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 8:46 PM
To: Deepak Shankar-TLS,Chennai.; Vladimir Pantelic;
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Suspend MPEG and do JPEG and vice versa on the fly

"Server" is only relevant for "remote" codecs.  Remote codecs exist on
processors with full-blown DSP's (e.g. OMAP3, DM644x, etc) and
"significant" hardware accelerators (e.g. DM357).

The DM355 does _not_ have a DSP, and therefore does not have remote
codecs.  So there is no "server" in the system.

It may be that the first codec consumes a scarce resource (like the
MJCP) and therefore, when creating the second codec that wants it, that
resource is not available.

To get a better look at what's going on, you could set CE_DEBUG=2 during
your second codec create, and you should get more details about what
failed.  http://tiexpressdsp.com/index.php?title=CE_DEBUG

To see if it's _really_ a resource issue, you may have to configure
RMAN.trace = true; in your app's .cfg script.  Something like this:

    RMAN = xdc.useModule('ti.sdo.fc.rman.RMAN');
    RMAN.trace = true;

RMAN is the "Resource Manager" for many of the codec resources.  By
enabling the RMAN trace, and especially running at CE_DEBUG=2 or =3, you
can get further insight into what resources each codec is asking for,
and whether it's "persistent" (non-shareable) or "scratch" (shareable,
but with a context save/restore overhead).

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]
> ] On Behalf Of Deepak Shankar-TLS,Chennai.
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:56 AM
> To: Vladimir Pantelic; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Suspend MPEG and do JPEG and vice versa on the fly
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks a lot for the inputs.
> 
> I think the codecs are running in the same server - for if I 
> dynamically kill the MPEG application and do a JPEG its working very 
> well. Just that I'm trying to do it in parallel. However is it 
> possible to program where the codec should run- by server I was 
> thinking the MJCP can work only as a single server(DSP server??) in 
> the DM355 for the ARM. Or is there a mechanism I could run 2 servers 
> on the same DSP... Please provide you inputs.
> 
> Is there any other option in the DM355 to make it work in parallel.
> Further Could you please suggest me a point to dig in the 
> DVSDK/(documentation or code) if its ever possible to make the JPEG 
> and MPEG run in parallel or is it a HW limitation?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Cheers,
> Deepak Shankar V
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Vladimir Pantelic
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 12:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Suspend MPEG and do JPEG and vice versa on the fly
> 
> Deepak Shankar-TLS,Chennai. wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I'm using the dm355-DVSDK, Montavista Linux and trying the demos - 
> > encode and JPEG. All those are working very well when run
> as separate
> > processes.
> > 
> > However, Now I'm trying to build a custom application which
> can do a
> > MPEG or JPEG based on some external events.
> > Something like when the GPIO is high dump an MPEG file. 
> When it is low
> 
> > capture a jpeg image every 1 second.
> > 
> > The problem is I'm not able to use both the JPEG and the
> MPEG codecs
> > simultaneously. When the MPEG compression is in progress, a call to 
> > the 'IMGENC1_create(ce, encoderName, &encParams)' is
> failing. Is this
> > a inherent nature of MJCP. Should I have to deinit the MPEG
> resources
> > when I want to do a JPEG, or is there a better way to do that.
> 
> are the two codecs in the same server? if not, it cannot work. you 
> will
>   have to unload one to load the other I think. Even if they are in 
> the same server, there could be system resources that cannot be 
> shared, so a gain they would not work in parallel.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list 
> [email protected]
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and

> intended for the named recipient(s) only.
> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its 
> affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely 
> those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of 
> HCL or its affiliates.
> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, 
> modification, distribution and / or publication of this message 
> without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
> delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail 
> and attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list 
> [email protected]
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> 

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to