Koen,
the Linux used / recommended for DaVinci products is a commercial
offering from MontaVista (MV pro 4.x or 5.x).
You can find some details about it on the MV website

http://www.mvista.com/product_detail_pro.php

or from the product folder of the DVSPB  (
http://focus.ti.com/docs/toolsw/folders/print/tmdsdvspba9.html )

There are lots of resources on the web, including FAQs from MV, which
explain the commercial offering value proposition, for example see

http://www.mvista.com/why.php

Also, as for my knowledge of GPL and open source licensing issues
there is no problem in redistributing a Linux distribution but
charging for other things like medium of distribution, support,
testing etc. When you get the MV Pro you get it of course in source
format.
This is something lots of companies do, not only in the embedded world

Stuff like patch integration, system testing, kernel maintenance,
professional development tools (DevRocket), development utilities, etc
are things that are typically very costly to do in-house and require a
technical expertise that not every company doing embedded products
has, or is willing to invest in, especially if it is not not their
core business.

So at the end there is a recognized commercial value in this business
model which is the value proposition of the MV Linux offering, and
having said that, in short I don't believe there is a violation of
anything.

Also, I do not want to start a flame on this since this mailing list
is focused to discuss on technical issues related to DaVinci Linux.

Still, I hope it helps reassuring you a bit, and I thank you in
advance for taking the survey  ;-)


On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 20-04-09 16:28, Leo DaVinci wrote:
>
>> In order to address the users expectations, please take part in a short
>> survey:
>>
>> http://www.ti.com/asia-codec-survey0902-en
>>
>> any feedback is precious and will be highly appreciated....
>
> Your survey implies that there is a non opensource linux, where did you get
> that from and why hasn't anyone sued its vendor yet for violating the GPL?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
>

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to