Hi Mark, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Mark A. Greer > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:13 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: da830 - Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:05:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > > From: Mark A. Greer <[email protected]> > > > > The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar > > to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, > > put the support for the da830 in the same directory as > > the davinci code. > > I meant to add a couple notes under the '---': > > 1) The writethrough dcache patch is required for this to run > on a da830 but not required for the patch to apply cleanly.
I tried the latest one from the linux-davinci list but it had fuzz: http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-April/012557.html This one, from the ARM subsystem list and which I am using below, applied without problems: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20090402.170938.515dcaa2.en.html > 2) There will be some "defined but not used" warnings from > mach-davinci/devices-da830.c because the platform data > struct hasn't been added to the source yet so I didn't make > a da830_register_<x>() routine for it. > > 3) Applies to ed400fa274a55d88a320ba752a94837b02defc41 Thanks for this. It builds for me but hangs after uncompressing the kernel. Do you see anything wrong with this sequence? $ git fetch $ git branch base ed400fa274a55d88a320ba752a94837b02defc41 fm $ git checkout base $ patch -s -p1 < ../patches/PATCH-ARM-Add-writethrough-dcache-support-for-ARM926EJS-processor.patch $ patch -s -p1 < ../patches/PATCH-1-3-ARM-DaVinci-Remove-unused-compare-reg-defines.patch $ patch -s -p1 < ../patches/PATCH-2-3-ARM-da830-Add-base-DA830-OMAP-L137-SoC-support.patch $ patch -s -p1 < ../patches/PATCH-3-3-ARM-da830-Add-support-for-DA830-OMAP-L137-EVM.patch $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-linux-gnueabi- da830_omapl137_defconfig $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-linux-gnueabi- uImage Also do I still need an RMII patch as before? http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-March/012198.html I see that the latest patches have "EMAC_VERSION_2" but no rmii_en setting. Although it doesn't look like my boot sequence is getting far enough for this to matter. Regards, Martin > Mark > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
