Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> writes: > David Brownell <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Thursday 14 May 2009, Troy Kisky wrote: >>> David Brownell wrote: >>> > .. >>> > >>> > NOTE: open issue, the DMA should be to/from SRAM; see chip >>> > errata for more info. The artifacts are extremely easy to >>> > hear on DM355 hardware (not yet supported in mainline), but >>> > don't seem as audible on DM6446 hardwaare (which does have >>> > mainline support). >>> >>> Is your SRAM interface headed for mainline. I'd hate to break >>> compile on mainline after it finally started working... >> >> I believe Kevin will send it there with his next set of patches; >> he's merged it into the DaVinci tree, along with all the other >> updates to the mach-davinci code (like the davinci_soc_info >> patches it depends on). >> >> I half suspect he'll send the davinci_soc_info updates first, >> then smaller patchsets for each SoC (dm355, dm6467, da830, etc) >> and its EVM. But we may need to wait till 2.6.31 gets nearer >> before we see those details. :) > > FYI... both the SoC platform updates and the SRAM interface have now > been merged into Russell King's tree. These will be merged when the > merge window opens and should show up in 2.6.31-rc1. > > Did this series get merged into ASoC? >
I now see that this is part of the topic/asoc branch of sound-2.6. Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
