"Paulraj, Sandeep" <[email protected]> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 5:43 PM >> To: Paulraj, Sandeep >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Adding DM365 entries to >> Makefile/Kconfig/defconfig >> >> [email protected] writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach- >> davinci/Kconfig >> > index 7640867..90325c7 100644 >> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig >> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig >> > @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ config ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x >> > bool "DaVinci 646x based system" >> > select AINTC >> > >> > +config ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365 >> > + bool "DaVinci 646x based system" >> > + select AINTC >> >> select ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx > [Sandeep] Kevin I could not understand this
Add that line after the 'select AINTC'. It sets the CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx option which is used for code that is common to all the DMxxxx family and used to differentiate from the DA8xx family. >> As all the DMx Soc's do (in addition to copy-paste bug caught by >> Sergei) > [Sandeep] Yes >> >> > config MACH_DAVINCI_EVM >> > @@ -64,6 +68,13 @@ config MACH_DAVINCI_DM6467_EVM >> > Configure this option to specify the whether the board used >> > for development is a DM6467 EVM >> > >> > +config MACH_DAVINCI_DM365_EVM >> > + bool "TI DM365 EVM" >> > + default ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365 >> >> depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365 > [Sandeep] I'll add this. > > I'll update patches 1/3 and 3/3. But what about Patch 2/3? > Patch 2/3 was fine. But please re-send all 3 as a v3 series. Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
